Hello!
I want to give you an update on the status of NWCEO’s charter school funding equity bill, HB 3397.
It is still in the House Revenue Committee. Since our public hearing in mid-March, we have continued to talk with Legislators in both the House and Senate, and we continue to build bipartisan support for it. We have enough votes to successfully move it off of the House floor, and we have enough votes to successfully move it off the Senate floor. However, it is still “stuck” in the Revenue Committee.
You may hear about “do or die” deadlines for bills in the Legislature this session, but please know that these deadlines only apply to policy committees, and not to Rules, Revenue, Ways & Means, or Redistricting committees. Since our bill is in Revenue, it could “drag on” all the way until June 30th. We certainly hope it does not, but that is a possibility. Please know our bill is NOT “dead” at this point, but is very much alive.
The primary reason it has not yet been scheduled for a vote (i.e., “work session”) in Revenue yet is because Rep Phil Barnhart (from the Eugene area) has not yet agreed to do this. Five-six committee members have committed to voting yes, so we are continuing with a variety of efforts to persuade Rep Barnhart. If any of you have any connections with him, or with others who know him, please let me know. Additionally, we need to continue to communicate with Rep Jules Bailey and Rep Tobias Read, so any of you who live in one of their Legislative Districts, and/or otherwise have connections with them, please continue to urge them to support this bill, and to urge Rep Barnhart to schedule it for a vote.
In your messaging, please remember to acknowledge the current cuts to all K-12 schools and remind Legislators that the cuts hurt charter schools even more deeply because we have a “lower starting point” to begin with.
Other key messages to convey:
- HB 3397 is not “more money charters.” It is decreasing the SUBSIDY that some districts currently have from charter school students.
- HB 3397 would ensure that charters receive their equitable share of public funds allocated to districts based on “head-count.” This bill would not entitle charters to any facility funds, transportation funds, or local funds, so it would still leave charter kids with a disparity.
- True, traditional public schools do not receive 95% of the SSF, but that is not an “apples to apples” comparison, as district schools receive extensive services from their districts, whereas each charter school is essentially an independent school system, and must provide all of its own financial, governance, personnel, facility, and other operational services.
- If HB 3397 becomes law, it would “shift” about ¼ of 1% of the K-12 budget to “follow the students” (i.e., the sky would not fall). The impact to districts would be minor or nil, but the impact to charters would be significant, enabling them to have more stable staffing, programs, and facilities.
- 5% is a typical “administrative rate” and more than adequate to support district charter school oversight responsibilities.
Thank you for continuing to share with us any responses you receive from Legislators.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions about this bill or other bills.
Best,
Kaaren
Kaaren Heikes, Executive Director
Northwest Center for Educational Options
Filed under: All School